Yesterday was a bit sticky there but we’re just grinding along now. Only 680 points before the S&P is done. Now people are calling for it to go to 400. Wow where were they when the S&P was 1000 or 900 or 800 or 700…wait…they waited for the S&P to go to 700. What happened to this guy that was calling for gas to be at $25? Well he isn’t talking anymore now that oil has stabilized. What about all the analyst in 2008 saying that the market will recover? Rhetoric, rhetoric, rhetoric. Everyone can talk but no one walks. Tired of listening to Roubini who is on television everyone hour talking about the collapse of our world while in fact, he has most of his retirement money in the stock market. Or perhaps I should listen to those who point out the mistakes of demand side economics who blame the length of the Great Depression on it while they suggest that free markets are the absolute answer to all problems while at the same time they praise supply side economics which first started this fiscal irresponsibility that is now blamed on demand siders. Well what really brought us out of the Great Depression? Well supply siders say it wasn’t the New Deal, it was World War II. Wait a minute, what did we do in World War II? Answer, government spending! Yes spending. Demand side. It’s all rhetoric.
While congressmen will always be a critique and blame the government for what they are doing? But rather they criticize but have no answers? What is there answer? Let them fail? Well what are the ramifications of letting Citibank, General Motors or AIG fail? Will it cause Lehman II or Lehman III? Will this be the point that drives us to the Great Depression? No one really knows but is it safer to tread a longer correction without the depth and despair or perhaps should be allow for the intense “creative destruction” of free markets? Oh long will it take for someone to replace the influence of Citibank or General Motors or AIG? Those are the questions that the critics will not answer. They rather criticize without solutions. Is it better to do something or just stand still?
Yet the argument goes on. What caused this mess? Was it government influence in the markets or was it the free markets? Well let’s look at the government place in the market. Well we have this antitrust thing they do. Well that hasn’t really been in effect since forever. Look at the reversion of the phone companies. AT&T almost back together. What about regulating financials? Well let’s see, regulation was rather dismal? Well it’s not quite government interference in free markets. Let’s look at free markets. Well people think free markets are nice and orderly where we get this nice simple equilibrium price where it utterly fair? Well we need to define fair? Well in free markets, it is a matter of survival of the fittest without regards to anything else. Nothing. Who cares about the disabled and elderly or even the young. Who cares about our environment. Who cares about deficits and leaving something for the children of the future. Who cares about waste and uneven distribution of anything. Who cares of equal footing for the discriminated and so on. The free markets in historical terms has always been looked at as a “jungle” where only the strongest survive.
In this world, the strongest is the ones with access to the information. It is now an information game. Perfect competition can only be possible where there is low barriers of entry and perfect information. Now information is the barrier because most things are not. How does this information flow? Well information only flows within a selected group of people while discrimination prevents the flow to other groups. When is the last time, you heard a big shot executive give a tip to a single teenage mother in East Los Angeles? Information is not free or is it a privilege. Privilege is based on membership. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a supporter of free markets, but only if it’s fair to a certain extent. Free markets are inherently unfair because of biases and preferences of human beings.
Now let’s look at the another problem. The classic problem of the tragedy of the commons. While every cattle farmer tries to optimize their profit by fattening up their cows, they ruin the pastures they all use. Well some people say where are those pastures? We have many pastures. The pasture of our fiscal accounts which is being decimated by gives aways to the rich, pork for those lobbies, and wars that benefit nothing more than oil companies and no bid contractors. Well that sounds like the government’s problems. Let’s keep in mind that the people have not run the government for decades. Lobbies and corporates have run the government for a rather long time and that can be easily argued. What other pastures? Well look at the environment. We are slowly creating our doom while decimating the world in which we live. For our children, we refuse to change to a clean fuel source and refuse to create financial incentives to prevent this. At this time, we still argue that using cap and trade policies are very un-American and anti-business. What about being anti-humanity? Come on people. There are many pastures that we destroy while pursuing the goal of optimizing profits.
Perhaps this may sound a bit socialist but the absolute choice of free markets is logical. It is perhaps necessary to bring these arguments in the forefront. It is merely an opinion based on years of economic study and analysis. People should not bring one sided stories especially from academics who most of the time refuse to accept the truth until it is obvious.
Disclosure: Long: UNG, SRE, AAPL, MSFT, CHK (Yes, crazy as it sounds, I’ve uber long going into the weekend)
(got out of my WFC position this morning at breakeven – after studying a bit of bank trading history for the last year, it seems that once a bank hit single digits, it never got back above $10)
Popularity: 8% [?]








