Let’s play a game where we figure out what the S&P is really worth. Just much like technical analysis these days, it seems like more art than science. Just like a chart you can always tell when the bottom is only when long after it turns, you can only figure out what is a reasonable PE only after the true earnings are presented. However all these numbers and charts suggest things in hindsight. But to help everyone with their awesome predictions of the bottom of the market, I present my S&P Valuation and Earnings chart:

So I’ve highlighted the most recent range on the chart and have also made a box around what the predicted earnings for this year will be which is about $45 by those great analyst out there. So under that earnings scenario which suggest a 30% drop in earnings from 2008 (which dropped 25% from 2007), there is a possible range of 915 with a PE of 20 and 450 with a PE of 10. Right now, we’re trading at a PE of about 14 which seems high to those crazy people calling for a PE of under 10 which I think is insane. Then you ask, well there were times that the PE were lower but if you studied your history, you will realize during those times, the risk free return was well above 6% which discouraged capital into the equities market. I would assume that most investors would like a return of at least 7% because if you add inflation (3%) plus risk (3% -4% risk free return), you’ll have anything above 7%. So if any risk free return like treasuries will provide this, it will drove capital toward this assets class thus competiting with other investment classes.
But the main question is not quite the earnings however it does need to be discussed. Earnings of last year was somewhat depressed because of write downs and this year’s earnings will be depressed not only because of a contraction (which won’t be permanent contrary to popular belief from the world) so we have to take those two things into consideration because by using this year’s earnings as the basis will leave you thinking that we’re living in the early 90s with those kinds of earnings specially considering that the CPI went from from about 150 in 1995 to 210 today. So with 40% increase in prices or inflation, we cannot expect earnings to be $45 for the S&P. But we’ll first work with the $45 earnings target which can change either up because of write ups if there are mark to market changes or go down simply because we all stay in our homes and never go to the mall again. But looking the chart, we are trading at a PE of about 13-14 based on the low expectations of 1994-1995 earnings. But the next question is what is a fair PE when people are calling for a PE of under 10 now? Or even 12 which puts the S&P at 588?
Well let’s look at PEs. The average PE from 1960 (mainly because we are looking at the S&P 500 and it was created only in 1957 – didn’t know that did you?) is about 16.8 including even the 70s and 80s when interest rates were sky high. We are not going to look at the Dow although it has a longer history because the Dow in the 1930s was a bad representation of history because there weren’t many companies in that index and it didn’t represent the diversity of the economy of today. It’s just comparing apples to oranges. When people make the comparison of the market drop in the 1930s to today, there are too many variables to make a good comparison. Anyways I decided to separate the years from years where the risk free rates were above 6% and years where risk free was below 6%. In a high rate environment, the PE was 12.5 and low rate environment was 19.75. So during this environment which is pretty much deflationary and low rate, we should expect something at least around 19 or so because the markets are forward looking. So if we did apply a PE of 19 to $45 in earnings, we have S&P at 870. But those are depressed earnings and the market knows that or does it.
Let’s just apply the 40% inflation from 1995 to 2009 to the earnings of $45 from that year. We have earnings of $63 for 2010 if we recover or probably closer to $70 since inflation will pick up a pick more by then. Normalizing the earnings will also get you about $70 so at a 12 PE, we have 820 but that is probably the bare minimum that we expect in 2010 when the economy recovers. But since the market looks about a year ahead, we should see 820 this year again. But if we apply a more normal PE of 14-16, we really have S&P at 980 – 1120. But those are just numbers just like the charts predict that we’ll go to 400 right?
(By the way, I was a bit wrong with WFC, it did get back over $10 which is the first time for any bank stock and if it hits my target of $12, boy I’m gonna be mad)